COURSE PRICE: $20.00
CONTACT HOURS: 2
This course will expire or be updated on or before April 1, 2014.
ABOUT THIS COURSE
You must score 70% or better on the test and complete the course evaluation to earn a certificate of completion for this CE activity.
ACCREDITATION / APPROVAL
Wild Iris Medical Education is an approved provider of continuing education by the American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA), Provider #3313. Courses are accepted by the NBCOT Certificate Renewal program.
Wild Iris Medical Education is approved as a provider of nursing continuing education by the Florida Department of Health, Division of Quality Assurance, Board of Nursing. Florida Board of Nursing Accreditation #NCE3403.
LEARNING LEVEL: Introductory
TARGET AUDIENCE: Occupational Therapists, Occupational Therapist Assistants
Domain of OT: Client Factors
Professional Issues: OT Education; Legal, Legislative & Regulatory Issues
Wild Iris Medical Education, Inc. provides educational activities that are free from bias. The information provided in this course is to be used for educational purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional health care. See our disclosures for more information.
This course meets the Florida state requirement for 2 hours of domestic violence continuing education.
CHECK THIS LIST FOR YOUR LICENSE BEFORE TAKING THE COURSE
Copyright © 2011 Wild Iris Medical Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
COURSE OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this course is to describe the risk factors, signs and symptoms, laws, interventions, and resources for domestic violence victims in the community, state, and nation.
Upon completion of this course, you will be able to:
Domestic violence is a major public health problem around the world and in the United States. It is a crime in all fifty states.
Domestic violence refers to physical, verbal, psychological, sexual, or economic abuse (e.g., withholding money, lying about assets) used to exert power or control over someone or to prevent someone from making a free choice. According to the U.S. Department of Justice (2010), “This includes any behaviors that intimidate, manipulate, humiliate, isolate, frighten, terrorize, coerce, threaten, blame, hurt, injure, or wound someone.” Rape, incest, and dating violence are all considered to be forms of domestic violence.
According to Florida s.741.28:
Domestic violence means any assault, aggravated assault, battery, aggravated battery, sexual assault, sexual battery, stalking, aggravated stalking, kidnapping, false imprisonment, or any criminal offense resulting in physical injury of one family or household member by another family or household member.
Family or household member means spouses, former spouses, persons related by blood or marriage, persons who are presently residing together as if a family or who have resided together in the past as if a family, and persons who are parents of a child in common regardless of whether they have been married. With the exception of persons who have a child in common, the family or household members must be currently residing or have in the past resided together in the same single dwelling unit.
Because the term domestic violence tends to overlook male victims as well as violence between same-sex partners, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) prefers the more specific term intimate partner violence (IPV). Some agencies prefer the term domestic abuse because it makes visible the nonphysical components of an abusive situation; these include psychological or emotional abuse, threatening, and stalking, as well as neglect or financial exploitation, particularly of older people. Family violence is also used to describe abusive domestic situations because any children in the family are affected, either as witnesses of violence and/or as victims themselves.
Domestic violence strikes all ages, cultural/ethnic/religious groups, and social classes. Intimate partner violence is one of the most common but least reported crimes, so it impossible to know the actual incidence and prevalence. Feelings of shame, fear, and hopelessness often prevent victims from seeking protection and support. Research shows that at least 4 out of 10 incidents of domestic violence are not reported to the police (Durose et al., 2005). Many abused women do not report IPV to their physicians or to anyone else. However, the statistics available confirm that the problem is pervasive and alarming.
Victims of IPV are usually women and children. Perpetrators of IPV are generally, though not always, men. According to CDC (2009b), each year, women experience nearly 5 million intimate partner–related physical assaults and rapes. (Men are the victims of nearly 3 million intimate partner–related physical assaults.)
More than three fourths of domestic violence victims are women. A landmark international study of 24,000 women in 10 countries found that 1 in 6 women has experienced domestic violence; yet the problem remains mostly hidden. Women who experience domestic violence have more than double the risk of poor health and physical and mental health problems than women not abused (WHO, 2005). According to Lee Jong-Wook, director-general of the World Health Organization (WHO), “This study shows that women are more at risk from violence at home than in the street.”
In 2005, IPV resulted in more 1,500 deaths, more than three fourths of which were women. On average each day, more than 3 women are murdered by their intimate partners in the United States. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics (2007), nearly one third of female homicides are committed by intimate partners. Females ages 20 to 24 were at greatest risk of nonfatal IPV. Children were exposed to IPV in nearly 40% of cases involving female victims.
IPV is disturbingly common among high school students. In the 2007 national Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance, about 10% of students in grades 9 to 12 reported having been hurt physically by a boyfriend or girlfriend during the 12 months preceding the survey. Dating violence was more prevalent among African American students than among white or Hispanic students. In another study, nearly 12% of female students reported ever having been physically forced to have sex against their will (Grunbaum et al., 2004).
According to CDC (2009a), those who harm their dating partners are more depressed and more aggressive than their peers. Other characteristics of abusive dating partners include:
Physical violence and psychological aggression can extend beyond dating partners and affect same-sex peer relationships. An analysis of students in grades 7, 9, 11, and 12 in a high-risk school district found that girls were significantly more likely than boys to report perpetration of physical violence and psychological aggression within dating relationships than boys were. However, boys were more likely than girls to report physically injuring a date, and also more likely than girls to report physical violence victimization and perpetration within same-sex peer relationships (Swahn et al., 2008).
Many older Americans, particularly women, experience intimate partner violence or abuse perpetrated by their family or other caretakers. According to the American Psychological Association (2007), each year an estimated 2.1 million older Americans experience physical, psychological, or other forms of abuse, neglect, or exploitation. But these statistics show only a small part of a horrific picture. Experts estimate that there are five unreported cases of abuse and neglect for every one reported.
Eight out of 10 abused elders are women, and those over age 80 are the most frequent victims of abuse. Lack of social support is a major risk factor for abuse. A study of 600 women ages 50 to 64 found that more than 5% experienced some form of abuse by their partners within the two years prior to the study. Women on public assistance reported even higher proportions of IPV as did those who had a recent history of homelessness (Somanti & Shibusawa, 2008). One study found that lifetime prevalence of IPV among older women was more than 26%; more than 18% experienced physical or sexual violence, and more than 20% experienced controlling behavior (Bonomi et al., 2007).
Media reports give the erroneous impression that elder abuse occurs primarily in nursing homes, but research indicates that most abuse and neglect of elders occurs at home. Most of the time, the perpetrators are spouses or family members (Hildreth et al., 2009).
Older women in abusive situations are the least likely to report IPV, primarily due to social and cultural values. A woman brought up in pre-1960s America tends to see her role as obeying her husband without question, believing that “you don’t air your dirty laundry in public.” Admitting that she’s being abused is admitting failure in the relationship. Some studies suggest that when asked, women will tell their physicians or other healthcare provider about abuse. However, most older women who do confide in someone about their abuse usually tell a close friend or family member.
Older women are more likely than younger women to experience violence for a longer time, generally a continuation of behaviors established early in a marriage. For some, however, abuse may begin in a new relationship after the divorce or death of a partner. For others, a decades-long marriage may become abusive for several reasons: failing health or disability of one partner, retirement, sexual changes, dementia, or use of alcohol or other drugs (Wilke & Vinton, 2005).
Although the precise incidence and prevalence of IPV among immigrant and refugee communities is unknown, IPV does exist within these groups. Several factors make it especially difficult for victims (primarily women) to seek or obtain help. The abuser may threaten to use the victim’s immigration status against her, evoking fear of deportation. Language barriers and lack of familiarity with U.S. systems are a further burden. A victim may also fear that reporting violence to the authorities will result in a hostile, insensitive, discriminatory response. In reality, that fear may be justified in some areas of the U.S. where mainstream organizations lack multicultural understanding or reflect prejudicial attitudes toward immigrants and refugees (Family Violence Prevention Fund, 2009).
Patriarchal cultural attitudes and victim-blaming also contribute to IPV in immigrant and refugee communities, just as they do throughout the United States. A study of more than 3,400 women found that the prevalence of IPV was higher among Latina than among non-Latina women (20% vs. 14% for the past 5 years, and 11% vs. 7% for the past year). Latina women also reported more physical symptoms and adverse mental health effects than did non-Latina women (Bonomi et al., 2009).
According to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE, 2009), the steady increase in Florida domestic violence cases ended in 1998 and continues to decline. Between 1992 and 2008, the rate of domestic violence cases (per 100,000 population) declined nearly 27%.
Although this downward trend is encouraging, domestic violence remains one of Florida’s most serious social problems. In 2008, domestic violence offenses accounted for 89% of violent crimes in Florida. That year, the number of reported cases of domestic violence exceeded 113,000 (FDLE, 2009).
Despite the downward trend in the numbers of domestic violence cases, domestic violence homicide, manslaughter, and stalking are increasing. The initial 6-month data for 2009 showed a disturbing 8.9% increase in domestic violence homicides, a 100% increase in domestic violence manslaughters, and a 38% increase in stalking, which often precedes homicide (FDLE, 2010).
A survey of Florida taxpayers found that most people believe that domestic violence is common. More than half the survey population reported knowing a victim of domestic violence. The vast majority indicated that treatment should be required for people who have physically abused someone. Most Floridians (85.3%) believe that imprisonment is the appropriate punishment for domestic violence incidents involving serious bodily injury (Florida Department of Corrections, 1999).
An overwhelming majority of Florida taxpayers believe that the state needs to spend more on prevention and treatment of domestic violence and on law enforcement related to domestic violence, even if it means an increase in taxes (Florida Department of Corrections, 1999).
The risk of becoming a victim of IPV is highest among American Indian and Alaskan Native women and men, African American women, Hispanic women, young women, women who are separated or divorced, and women below the poverty line (BJS, 2007). Other risk factors include alcohol and drug use, high-risk sexual behavior, having witnessed or experienced violence as a child, being poorly educated, and unemployment. Women whose male partner is verbally abusive, jealous, or possessive are at high risk for IPV. Couples with disparities in income, education, or job status are also at higher risk for IPV (Crandall et al., 2004).
Poverty damages health and well-being in countless ways; exposure to domestic violence is just one. Women in households with the lowest annual incomes have the highest average annual rates of IPV. Women living in rental housing had three times the rate of IPV of women living in owned housing (BJS, 2007).
When IPV and persistent poverty intersect, they limit coping options. Both poverty and IPV lead to stress, feelings of powerlessness, and social isolation, which combine to produce posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and other emotional difficulties (Goodman et al., 2009). Such women face risks from the batterer and risks resulting from their poverty. Risks from the batterer include physical injury; threats and loss of security, housing, and income; and potential loss of their children. Risks from poverty include food insecurity, lack of access to health insurance and healthcare, possibly racism, unsafe neighborhoods, and poor schools for their children.
The double jeopardy of poverty and IPV challenges abused women and the healthcare and social service professionals responsible for protecting them. Intervening to stop the violence is only the first step. Issues of income, housing, and healthcare—both mental and physical—must also be addressed.
Families stressed by illness, unemployment, alcohol, and/or drug use are more likely to experience violence. This is particularly true with elder abuse, especially if the older person is frail or mentally impaired, the caregiver is ill-prepared for the task, or needed resources are unavailable. Adult children who abuse their parents frequently suffer from mental and emotional disorders, alcoholism, drug addiction, and/or financial problems that make them dependent on the parents for support.
Violence is a learned behavior and creates a painful legacy in some families. These families respond to tension or conflict with violence because they have not learned any other way to respond.
The National Domestic Violence Hotline (NDVH) answers 21,000 calls each month. Since the economic downturn began in 2008, calls to NDVH have increased significantly, and more than half the calls indicated a change in household financial situation (NDVH, 2009). Three out of four domestic violence shelters reported an increase in women seeking assistance from abuse since September 2008 (Mary Kay, 2009). This trend confirms earlier research showing that domestic violence increases when couples are experiencing financial stress such as unemployment (Benson & Fox, 2002, 2004).
Pregnancy may trigger or intensify domestic violence, particularly if the male partner is unemployed or sees the child as a rival for the woman’s time and attention. Violence occurs in up to 8% of pregnancies and is particularly associated with unplanned pregnancy. More than 300,000 women each year experience IPV during their pregnancy (Gazmararian et al., 2000).
Homicide was a leading cause of injury deaths among pregnant and postpartum women in the United States during the 1990s (Chang et al., 2005). Risk factors for pregnancy-related homicide included: age younger than 20 years, African American, and late or no prenatal care. Firearms were the most common method of homicide.
People with disabilities, especially women, are at higher risk for IPV, particularly sexual violence, than people without disabilities: 33% and 21%, respectively. In addition, those who have a disability experience abuse for longer periods of time (Barrett et al., 2009). The perpetrators of domestic sexual violence, including sexual abuse, sexual assault, and rape, are most often male caregivers who may be family members. Sixteen percent of violent crimes against females with a disability were committed by an intimate partner (BJS, 2009b).
According to the CDC (2009b), between one fourth and two thirds of adults with cognitive impairments experience sexual violence; rates of sexual violence among women with cognitive disabilities range up to 79%. Reported rates among adolescent boys with disabilities range up to 6%, while reported rates for adolescent girls with disabilities are about 24%.
Having a disability limits a woman’s options for escaping or resolving the abuse. For example, if an abusive partner withholds needed equipment, such as a wheelchair or assistance with dressing or getting out of bed, this prevents access to programs that could help end the abuse (Nosek et al., 2001). Unemployment further disadvantages women with disabilities, decreasing their chances of being able to break the cycle of violence (Smith & Strauser, 2008).
Women living with HIV also can be at increased risk for IPV. According to the National Women’s Health Information Center, many HIV-positive women report emotional, physical, or sexual abuse at some time after their diagnosis.
Saltzman and colleagues (2002) identify four types of IPV:
They define physical violence as “the intentional use of physical force with the potential for causing death, disability, injury, or harm. Physical violence includes but is not limited to scratching, pushing, shoving, throwing, grabbing, biting, choking, shaking, slapping, punching, burning, use of a weapon, and use of restraints or one’s body, size, or strength against another person.“
Sexual violence has three categories: “(1) use of physical force to compel a person to engage in a sexual act against his or her will, even if the act is not completed; (2) attempted or completed sex act involving a person who is unable to understand the nature or condition of the act, to decline participation, or to communicate unwillingness to engage in the sexual act because of illness, disability, or the influence of alcohol or other drugs, or because of intimidation or pressure; and (3) abusive sexual contact.”
Sexual violence can also include reproductive coercion, such as deliberately exposing a partner to sexually transmitted infections (STIs); attempting to impregnate a partner against her will (by damaging condoms or throwing away her birth control pills, also called birth control sabotage); threats or acts of violence if the partner does not comply with the perpetrator’s wishes concerning the decision to terminate or continue a pregnancy; as well as threats or acts of violence if the partner refuses to have sex (Family Violence Prevention Fund, 2008). In a recent study of women ages 16 to 29 years seeking care in family planning clinics, researchers found that more than half of these women reported IPV and 1 in 5 of them reported pregnancy coercion and birth control sabotage. Both IPV and reproductive coercion are associated with unintended pregnancy (Miller et al., 2010).
Threats of physical or sexual violence include the use of “words, gestures, or weapons to communicate the intent to cause death, disability, injury, or physical harm.”
Psychological/emotional violence “involves trauma to the victim caused by acts, threats of acts, or coercive tactics.” Psychological/emotional abuse can include but is not limited to humiliation, controlling what the victim can and cannot do, withholding information, deliberately embarrassing the victim, isolating the victim from family and friends, and denying access to money or other basic resources.
Stalking is considered by the federal government, all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and U.S. territories as a type of IPV and a criminal act. Stalking is defined as a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to feel fear (BJS, 2009A).
The Bureau’s Supplemental Victimization Survey (2006) identified seven types of harassing or unwanted behaviors consistent with a course of conduct experienced by stalking victims. The survey classified as stalking victims those who experienced at least one of the following behaviors on at least two separate occasions:
Although these acts individually may not be criminal, collectively and repetitively they may cause a victim to fear for his or her safety or the safety of a family member.
STALKING AND FLORIDA LAW
Florida law (s.784.048) defines stalking as “willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly following, harassing, or cyberstalking another person,” which is a misdemeanor. Florida law defines cyberstalking as engaging in “a course of conduct to communicate, or to cause to be communicated, words, images, or language by or through the use of electronic mail or electronic communication, directed at a specific person, causing substantial emotional distress to that person and serving no legitimate purpose.”
If the stalker makes “a credible threat with the intent to place that person [the one being stalked] in reasonable fear of death or bodily injury of the person or the person’s child, sibling, spouse, parent, or dependent,” the offense becomes aggravated stalking, which is a felony. Stalking or cyberstalking a minor under 16 years of age is also considered aggravated stalking.
Stalking often precedes murder or attempted murder of women by their intimate partners (femicide). Researchers reported that three fourths of women murdered by their former partners had been stalked by their partners in the year prior to their murder. Most women were stalked after the relationship had ended. More than half of femicide victims had reported the stalking to police before they were killed by their stalkers (McFarlane et al., 1999).
The National Center for Victims of Crime (2003) defines cyberstalking as “threatening behavior or unwanted advances directed at another using the Internet and other forms of online and computer communications.”
Cyberstalking has become an all-too-common means of harassment, particularly by spurned intimate partners. For example, one Florida woman reported to the Tampa police that a man she had dated for eight weeks called her 600 times in two days after their breakup. In addition, he sent her more than 100 emails in one month (Kalfrin, 2007). As with other forms of IPV, victims often fail to report cyberstalking.
RESPONDING TO CYBERSTALKING
Even though cyberstalking does not involve physical contact with the perpetrator, it can constitute emotional and psychological abuse. NCVC recommends that victims send the stalker one clear written warning stating that the contact is unwanted and demanding a cessation of sending any communications. If the harassment continues, victims should file a complaint with the perpetrator’s Internet service provider (ISP) as well as with their own ISP. Victims should keep copies of all written communications and a log of phone calls. Filing a report with local law enforcement requesting a protective injunction puts the crime on record in the event that legal prosecution becomes necessary.
The explosion of digital technology—cellular phones, GPS systems, the Internet and social networking sites such as Facebook and YouTube—has made teens the most “connected” generation in history. However, this technology is abused by some, resulting in cyberstalking, cyberbullying, harassment, sexting (sharing naked images of themselves or others), and dating abuse. Collectively, these activities are known as digital abuse, which is pervasive among teens (Associated Press-MTV, 2009).
Half of people ages 14 to 24 reported experiencing digitally abusive behavior, and females were more likely to have been targeted than males. Nearly 1 in 4 young people currently in a dating relationship report that their dating partner checks up with them many times each day either online or by cell phone to see where they are, whom they are with, and what they’re doing. Others report that their dating partners attempt to manipulate and control them by checking the text messages on their phone without permission, demanding their passwords, or demanding that they “unfriend” former dating partners on social networks.
DATING VIOLENCE AND FLORIDA LAW
Floride legislation defines dating violence as “violence between individuals who have or have had a continuing and significant relationship of a romantic or intimate nature.” The existence of such a relationship is determined based on the consideration of the following factors:
It clarifies that those who are in a dating relationship are not required to have resided together to be eligible for an injunction for protection against violence.
Research indicates that intimate partner violence (IPV) occurs in a three-phase cycle (Walker, 1984):
When stress and conflict begin to build, the cruel cycle begins again. Over time, the first two phases grow longer and the honeymoon phase diminishes and eventually disappears.
People outside of abusive relationships often wonder both why a perpetrator abuses and why a victim of abuse remains in such a relationship. Health professionals need to understand the complexity of factors in these relationships to make accurate assessments and offer appropriate assistance. Abusers want power and control, and all their various behaviors are intended to achieve that end.
Although an abuser’s behavior may arise from or be exacerbated by a mental illness, that is not usually the case; however, abusive behaviors may be complicated by substance abuse problems. Health professionals should be alert to any signs of these complicating factors when making assessments.
There are many reasons why victims stay in abusive relationships, and in any given relationship there may be numerous factors that form an interrelated web. These reasons can be divided into three broad categories: situational factors, emotional factors, and personal beliefs.
|Source: WRAP, n.d.|
While most victims of domestic violence are women, men are sometimes victims. Like women, men remain in these relationships for a variety of reasons. The most frequent seem to be:
It is important for healthcare professionals to understand the many reasons why victims remain in these relationships in order to provide appropriate treatment, assistance, and referrals. However, it is also important to note that speculating on the reasons with a victim or within their earshot is to turn the focus onto the victim’s behavior when it should always remain on the abuser’s behavior.
Domestic violence has an enormous impact on the health of those who are affected as well as on the healthcare system.
Injuries sustained during episodes of violence are only part of the damage to victims’ health. Physical and psychological abuse are related to other adverse effects, including back pain, pelvic pain, gynecological disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, problem pregnancies, sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), headaches, central nervous system disorders, and heart or circulatory conditions (Coker et al., 2000; Campbell et al., 2002; Heise & Garcia-Moreno, 2002; Plichta, 2004; Tjaden & Thoennes, 2000).
Intimate partner violence is also linked to mental health problems, including depression, anxiety, antisocial behavior, low self-esteem, inability to trust men, fear of intimacy, and posttraumaticstress disorder (Dutton, 2009). Women who have experienced IPV also have an increased risk of substance abuse, suicide, and risky sexual activity (SOGC, 2005).
Intimate partner violence often leads to chronic pain and/or depression. Although chronic pain and depression may have causes other than IPV, either symptom should alert healthcare providers to ask about IPV, especially in older patients (Zink et al., 2005).
Battering can lead to high blood pressure or edema, vaginal bleeding, kidney or urinary tract infection, miscarriage, preterm labor, low birthweight, or other injury to the developing fetus (Silverman et al., 2006) as well as to posttraumatic stress disorder. The stress of abuse may also cause pregnant women to continue such unhealthy habits as smoking and drug or alcohol use.
Maternal mortality is 3 times as high for abused mothers, and abused African American mothers are 4 times as likely to die as their white counterparts. IPV also increases the risk of fetal death to approximately 16 per 1000 affected pregnancies (Boy & Salihu, 2004). Abused women are also at high risk for postpartum depression, which can interfere with breastfeeding and affect their relationships with their babies and other children as well as with other adults (Kendall-Tackett, 2007).
Research indicates that as many as 10 million American children witness IPV within their families each year (Carlson, 2000). Even if they are not physically injured, these children report numerous fears about their mothers, including fear of serious harm to her and to themselves, as well as fear of abandonment. Living with intense anger and unpredictable behaviors creates a chronic, corrosive anxiety state, which researchers call toxic stress. This toxic stress can interfere with normal brain development and compromise long-term physical and mental health (National Scientific Council on the Developing Child, 2005).
Witnessing IPV in childhood can result in such effects as alcoholism, illicit drug use, IV drug use, and depression during adulthood (Dube et al., 2002). Exposure to IPV as a child can also lead to intergenerational transmission of violence, both physical and psychological perpetration and victimization. Researchers write that “childhood exposure to violence is a consistent predictor of involvement in relationships characterized by violence for males and females” (Gover et al., 2008). Child victims of violence, particularly boys, often grow up to become batterers themselves.
In another study, women exposed to IPV as children were three times more likely to report IPV victimization as adults. Men exposed to IPV in childhood were nearly four times more likely to report IPV perpetration as adults (Whitfield et al., 2003). Both men and women were more likely to attempt suicide (Dube et al., 2001).
Women are the most frequent consumers of healthcare services and the most common victims of domestic violence. This puts healthcare providers in the best position to identify victims of domestic violence and make appropriate referrals to protect them against further harm.
Primary care providers whose practice includes women have a critical role in identifying IPV and intervening appropriately. Professional organizations have recommended routine screening of patients and families for domestic violence, including the American Medical Association (2005) and the American Nurses Association (2000).
Even though many healthcare providers are alert to signs of potential child abuse, too few screen for IPV among adults. One third of U.S. physicians surveyed said that they don’t record patients’ reports of domestic violence and 90% don’t document whether patients are offered information or other support. One third of physicians surveyed admitted that they did not feel confident about counseling patients who reported IPV (Gerber, 2005). Even though the prevalence of elder abuse was recently reported at more than 11% (Acierno et al., 2010) in people over 60, only 2% of reported elder abuse cases come through physicians.
Another survey of social workers, family practitioners, and obstetrician-gynecologists in Florida found that only 20% of participants always or nearly always routinely screened for domestic violence, and 24% reported that routine screening did not apply to their role (Tower, 2006).
Barriers to routine screening include inadequate educational and experiential preparation, as well as “real world” pressures of daily primary-care practice (Gutmanis et al., 2007). Lack of relevant education on screening also could be a major reason why physicians often fail to screen for IPV/elder abuse (Halphen et al., 2009). Researchers in Michigan reported that “elder abuse education is not a consistent or highly prioritized topic in many primary-care residency programs” (Wagenaar et al, 2009).
Nurses and physicians in all settings where older people receive care need to be aware of the possibility of IPV and elder abuse as well as their legal requirements for reporting the abuse to the appropriate government agencies. Home care workers and pre-hospital care providers (paramedics) also need education on the signs and symptoms of IPV/elder abuse and neglect. In Maryland, one fourth of pre-hospital care providers surveyed defined elder abuse as a social problem, not a medical problem. Likewise, one third of respondents indicated that they would suspect dementia, depression, or other reasons rather than abuse for a report of sexual assault in an elderly patient (Rinker, 2009).
Every healthcare facility serving women, children, and older adults needs to screen for potential domestic violence. This screening need not be lengthy. In fact, researchers have developed an effective 2-minute assessment screen for early detection of abuse of women (Brown et al., 1996). The screening can be part of the intake interview or included as part of the written history.
|Question||Circle Best Answer|
|Source: Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada, n.d. Used with permission.|
|1. In general, how would you describe your relationship?||A lot of tension||Some tension||No tension|
|2. Do you and your partner work out arguments with…||Great difficulty||Some difficulty||No difficulty|
|3. Do arguments ever result in you feeling put down or bad about yourself?||Often||Sometimes||Never|
|4. Do arguments ever result in hitting, kicking, or pushing?||Often||Sometimes||Never|
|5. Do you ever feel frightened by what your partner says or does?||Often||Sometimes||Never|
|6. Has your partner ever abused you physically?||Often||Sometimes||Never|
|7. Has your partner ever abused you emotionally?||Often||Sometimes||Never|
|8. Has your partner ever abused you sexually?||Often||Sometimes||Never|
The University of Maine Center on Aging (2007) has developed a brief screening protocol for screening older patients for domestic abuse and violence. The center recommends that all patients 60 years old and older should be routinely screened at least once a year for elder mistreatment. The protocol consists of a brief introduction followed by 6 questions:
|Source: Adapted by the University of Maine Center on Aging, 2007. Used with permission.|
|1. Has anyone close to you called you names or put you down recently?||Yes||No|
|2. Are you afraid of anyone in your life?||Yes||No|
|3. Are you able to use the telephone any time you want to?||Yes||No|
|4. Has anyone forced you to do things you didn’t want to do?||Yes||No|
|5. Has anyone taken things or money that belong to you without your OK?||Yes||No|
|6. Has anyone close to you tried to hurt you or harm you recently?||Yes||No|
Patients should have the opportunity to respond to the questions in a confidential setting outside the presence of the patient’s family, caregiver, or the person who brings the patient to the appointment.
Healthcare providers should be alert for signs and symptoms that may be related to IPV. Delay in seeking care, missed appointments, and vague or inconsistent explanation of injuries or nonspecific somatic complaints should be noted. Depression, chronic pain, and social isolation are common, as are substance abuse and use of alcohol or drugs. Be especially attuned to signs of abuse in pregnant clients, because abuse often escalates during pregnancy.
During the appointment, be aware of lack of eye contact and/or a husband or boyfriend who is reluctant to leave the woman alone with the healthcare provider. Victims of abuse may appear fearful, anxious, withdrawn, angry, nonresponsive, or afraid to talk openly. Suicide attempts may be directly related to IPV.
During the physical examination, look for injuries on many areas of the body, especially the face, throat, neck, chest, abdomen, and genitals. Note any bruises, burns, or wound patterns that resemble teeth marks, hand prints, belts, or cigarette tips. Note any pain or tenderness from touching. Be alert for puncture wounds, fractures and dislocations, scars on the vulva or rectum, or any unexplained vaginal or anal bleeding, particularly in older people. Be aware that the woman may wear a glove or sock to conceal a scalded hand or foot.
Following an established procedure for examination will ensure that no critical information is overlooked:
Women who show signs of physical abuse should also be screened for STIs, including chlamydia, human papilloma virus, gonorrhea, and syphilis. One study found that approximately 64% of rural women with an STD are involved in an abusive physical and sexual relationship (Clifford, 2003).
Accurate, thorough documentation of the patient’s injuries is essential in cases of suspected abuse because it can serve as objective, third-party evidence useful in legal proceedings. For example, medical records can help victims to obtain a restraining order or to qualify for public housing, welfare, health and life insurance, and immigration relief.
To be admissible in a court of law, medical documentation should include the following (Isaac & Enos, 2001):
Health professionals should avoid any phrases—such as “patient claims” or “patient alleges”—that cast doubt on the patient’s reliability. Also avoid legal terms such as “alleged perpetrator” or “assailant.” Do not use conclusive terms such as “assault and battery” or “domestic violence” in documenting a case; let the factual information in the record speak for itself.
When assessment and examination are complete, review any therapeutic protocols with the client and provide a supportive and encouraging environment in which the client can seek help and get support. Be prepared to:
(A list of resources appears at the end of this course.)
Healthcare professionals should also use the following questions to evaluate immediate safety issues:
Be sure you understand and can implement your facility’s established safety protocols.
The person reporting abuse should be prepared to describe:
Florida law requires healthcare providers and others to report suspected abuse of vulnerable adults to the Florida Abuse Hotline. Abuse means any willful act or threatened act by a relative, caregiver, or household member which causes or is likely to cause significant impairment to a vulnerable adult’s physical, mental, or emotional health. Abuse includes acts and omissions (415.102(1), F.S.). All reports are confidential, including the name of the reporter. A list of the occupations required to report suspected abuse of vulnerable adults is provided in the box below.
OCCUPATIONS REQUIRED TO REPORT ABUSE OF VULNERABLE ADULTS
In 2006, the Adult Protective Services statute was amended to enable the Department of Children and Families (DCF) to petition the court for an order authorizing the provision of protective services if a vulnerable adult in need of protective services is being abused, neglected, or exploited but lacks the capacity to consent to the provision of protective services (415.105(1), F.S.). In addition, the statute now enables the Agency for Persons with Disabilities (APD) to gain access to information in the central abuse hotline data (415.107, F.S.).
Florida statute 790.24 requires healthcare providers to report gunshot or life-threatening wounds or injuries. Obviously, this does not cover the majority of injuries sustained in IPV. However, reporting suspected domestic violence without the informed consent of the victim is unethical and may cause the abuser to retaliate.
When it is appropriate to report domestic violence, call 1-800-500-1119.
Florida law requires that all health professionals, including employees of long-term care facilities, report known or suspected cases of elder abuse.
If the abuse was perpetrated by the spouse/partner or other person known to the victim, it constitutes domestic violence. The National Center on Elder Abuse (2006) encourages health professionals not to try to answer, “Is this domestic violence?” or “Is this elder abuse?” Instead, efforts should be made to maximize both the domestic violence and aging networks services by partnering to meet the unique needs of older victims.
The Domestic Violence Program regulates, certifies, and monitors domestic violence centers across the state of Florida. As of 2010, there are 42 certified domestic violence centers that provide crisis intervention and support services to adult victims of domestic violence and their children free of charge, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
Most communities also have child protective services and adult protective services agencies to which known or suspected cases of abuse should be reported. (A list of additional resources is provided below.)
Florida law has established batterers intervention programs for perpetrators of domestic violence. Attendance at a batterers intervention program is usually imposed by the court as a condition of probation. According to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE, 2010), 75% of those who perpetrate domestic violence are male, and therefore its efforts at certification of and setting standards for these programs has focused on programs designed for men who commit acts of domestic violence.
Our society is dealing with what has been called an epidemic level of violence in daily life. Healthcare professionals can make a critical difference in the progress toward ending this costly, destructive epidemic and halting the transmission of violence from generation to generation. By being alert to the possibility of domestic abuse in patients of every age, race, and socioeconomic group, the victims of abuse can be identified, protected, and assisted in resolving their situation.
Domestic Abuse Helpline for Men and Women
Florida Abuse Hotline
TDD number: 1-800-453-5145
Fax line: 1-800-914-0004
Florida Domestic Violence Hotline
TTY number: 1-800-621-4202
Florida Elder Helpline
Florida Statewide Senior Legal Helpline
National Center for Victims of Crime
National Domestic Violence Hotline
TTY number: 1-800-787-3224
National Resource Center on Domestic Violence
Rape, Abuse, and Incest National Network (RAINN)
American Academy of Family Physicians
Battered Women’s Justice Project
Break the Cycle (Teen dating violence)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Children’s Bureau/Administration for Children and Families
Choose Respect (CDC-sponsored to end dating violence)
Dating Matters (60-minute interactive training on teen dating violence)
Elder Justice Coalition
Family Violence Prevention Fund
Florida Coalition Against Domestic Violence
Healthy People 2010
Love Is Not Abuse
National Center for Victims of Crime
National Center on Elder Abuse
National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect Information
National Latino Alliance for the Elimination of Domestic Violence
National Women’s Health Information Center
Senior Victim Advocate Program (Pinellas and Pasco Counties [6th Circuit] only)
Violence Against Women Network
Acierno R, Hernandez MA, Amstadter AB, Resnick HS, Steve K, Muzzy W & Kilpatrick DG. (2010). Prevalence and correlates of emotional, physical, sexual, and financial abuse and potential neglect in the United States: The national elder mistreatment study. American Journal of Public Health, 100(2), 292–297.
American Medical Association (AMA). (2005). Report 7 of the Council on Scientific Affairs (A-05): Diagnosis and management of family violence. Retrieved March 28, 2010, from http://www.ama-assn.olrg/ama/no-index/about-ama/15248.shtml.
American Nurses Association (ANA). (2000). Position statement on violence against women. Retrieved March 29, 2010, from http://www.nursingworld.org/SocialCausesHealthCare.
American Psychological Association (APA). (2007). Elder abuse and neglect: In search of solutions. Retrieved March 31, 2010, from http://www.apa.org/pi/aging/resources/guides/elder-abuse.aspx.
Associated Press-MTV. (2009). A Thin Line: 2009 AP-MTV Digital Abuse Study. Retrieved March 15, 2010, from http://www.research.ATHINLINE.org.
Barrett KA, O’Day B, Roche A & Carlson BL. (2009). Intimate partner violence, health status, and health care access among women with disabilities. Women’s Health Issues, 19(2), 94–100.
Benson ML & Fox GL. (2002). Economic distress, community context and intimate violence: An application and extension of social disorganization theory, final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
Benson ML & Fox GL. (2004). When violence hits home: How economics and neighborhood play a role. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
Bonomi AE, Anderson ML, Cannon EA, Slesnick N, Rodriguez MA. (2009). Intimate partner violence in Latina and non-Latina women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(1), 43–48.
Bonomi AE, Anderson ML, Reid RJ, Carrell D, Fishman PA, Rivara FP & Thompson RS. (2007). Intimate partner violence in older women. Gerontologist, 47(1), 34–41.
Boy A & Salihu H. (2004). Intimate partner violence and birth outcomes: A systematic review. International Journal of Fertility and Women’s Medicine 49, 159–164.
Brown JB, Lent B, Brett PJ. (1996). Development of the woman abuse screening tool for use in family practice. Family Medicine, 28(6), 422–428.
Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), U.S. Department of Justice. (2009a). National crime victimization survey: Stalking victimization in the United States. Retrieved March 20, 2010, from http://www.ncvc.org/src/AGP.Net/Components/DocumentViewer/Download.aspxnz?DocumentID=45862.
Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), U.S. Department of Justice. (2009b). Crime against people with disabilities, 2007. Retrieved March 20, 2010, from http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=2022
Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), U.S. Department of Justice. (2007). Intimate partner violence in the U.S. Retrieved March 24, 2010, from http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/ipvus.pdf.
Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), U.S. Department of Justice. (2006). Supplemental victimization survey 2006. Retrieved March 20, 2010, from http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/svs1_06.pdf.
Campbell JC, Jones AS, Dienemann J, et al. (2002). Intimate partner violence and physical health consequences. Archives of Internal Medicine, 162, 1157–1163.
Carlson BE. (2000). Children exposed to intimate partner violence: Research findings and implications for intervention. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 1, 321–342.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2009a). Understanding teen dating violence: Fact sheet. Retrieved March 2, 2010, from http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2009b). Intimate partner violence: Fact sheet. Retrieved March 29, 2010, from http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention.
Chang J, Berg CJ, Saltzman LE, et al. (2005). Homicide: A leading cause of injury deaths among pregnant and postpartum women in the United States, 1991–1999. American Journal of Public Health, 9, 471–477.
Clifford, A. (2003). Intimate partner violence in rural women. Kentucky Nurse, 51(4), 9.
Coker A, Smith, P, Bethea L, et al. (2000). Physical health consequences of physical and psychological intimate partner violence. Archives of Family Medicine, 9(5), 451–457.
Crandall M, Nathens AB, Kernic MA, et al. (2004). Predicting future injury among women in abusive relationships. Journal of Trauma Injury, Infection and Critical Care, 56(4), 906–12.
Dube SR, Anda RF, Fellitti VJ, Edwards VJ. (2002). Exposure to abuse, neglect and household dysfunction among adults who witnessed intimate partner violence as children: Implications for health and social services. Violence & Victims, 17(1), 3–17.
Dube, SR, Anda RF, Felitti VJ, Chapman D, Williamson DF, Giles WH. (2001). Childhood abuse, household dysfunction and the risk of attempted suicide throughout the life span: Findings from the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 286(24), 3089–3096.
Durose MR, Harlow CS, Langan PA, et al. (2005). Family violence statistics: Including statistics on strangers and acquaintances. U.S. Department of Justice. NCJ 207846. Retrieved December 23, 2005, from http://www.ojp.udsoj.gov/bjs.
Dutton MA. (2009). Pathways linking intimate partner violence and posttraumatic disorder. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 10(3), 211–224.
Family Violence Prevention Fund. (2009). Intimate partner violence in immigrant and refugee communities: Challenges, promising practices, and recommendations. A report by the Family Violence Prevention Fund for the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Retrieved December 14, 2010, from http://www.endabuse.org.
Family Violence Prevention Fund. (2008). Features: Study: Many victims of partner violence experience reproductive coercion. Accessed March 10, 2010, from http://www.endabuse.org/content/features/detail/1439.
Florida Coalition Against Domestic Violence. (2004). Cut out domestic violence. Retrieved January 26, 2007, from http://www.fcadv.org/projectsDomestic.html.
Florida Department of Children and Families, Domestic Violence Office. (2010). Circles of collaboration: Domestic violence annual report. Retrieved March 20, 2010, from http://www.dcf.state.fl.us/programs/domesticviolence/publications/docs/DVAnnualReport0809.pdf.
Florida Department of Corrections. (1999). Florida’s perspective on domestic violence. Retrieved from http://www.dc.state.fl.us/pub/domestic/exsum.html.
Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE). (2010). Crime in Florida. Retrieved March 20, 2010, from http://www.fdle.state.fl.us/Content/getdoc/b052b984-d544-4b12-be49-b690746cd35e/2009SA_CIF.aspx.
Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE). (2009). Reported domestic violence by Florida jurisdiction, 1996–2008. Retrieved March 20, 2010, from http://www.fdle.state.fl.us/Content/getdoc/242d049d-89a1-451e-9ca2-93959d61d692/dvoff_jur08.aspx.
Gazmararian JA, Petersen R, Spitz AM, et al. (2000). Violence and reproductive health: Current knowledge and future research directions. Maternal Child Health Journal, 4, 79–84.
Gerber MR, Leiter KS, Hermann RC, et al. (2005). How and why community hospital clinicians document a positive screen for intimate partner violence: A cross-sectional study. BMC Family Practice. doi:10.1186/1471-2296/6/48.
Goodman LA, Smyth KF, Borges AM, Singer R. (2009). When crises collide: How intimate partner violence and poverty intersect to shape women’s mental health and coping? Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 10(4), 306–329.
Gover AR, Kaukinen C, Fox KA. (2008). The relationship between violence in the family of origin and dating violence among college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(12), 1667–1693.
Grunbaum JA, Kann L, Kinchen S, et al. (2004). Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2003. MMWR, 53(SS-2), 1–100. Retrieved December 30, 2005, from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5302a1.htm.
Gutmanis I, Beynon C, Tutty L, Wathen CN, MacMillan HL. (2007). Factors influencing identification of and response to intimate partner violence: A survey of physicians and nurses. BMC Public Health, 7(12). doi:10.1186/1471-245807-12.
Halphen JM, Varas GM, Sadowsky JM. (2009). Recognizing and reporting elder abuse and neglect. Geriatrics, 64(7), 13–18.
Heise L & Garcia-Moreno C. (2002). Violence by intimate partners. In E Krug, L Dahlberg, J Mercy, et al. (eds.), World Report on Violence and Health, (pp. 87–121). Geneva: WHO.
Hildreth CJ, Burke AE, Glass RM. (2009). Elder abuse. Journal of the American Medical Association, 302(5), 588.
Isaac NE & Enos VP. (2001). Documenting domestic violence: How healthcare providers can help victims. Washington DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.ncjrs.org/txtfiles1/nij/188564.txt.
Kalfrin V. (2007). Better stalking laws needed, group says. Tampa Tribune, January 22, 2007. Retrieved January 24, 2007, from http://www.tbo.com/news/metro/MGBSLG1B8XE.html.
Kendall-Tacket KA. (2007). Violence against women and the perinatal period: The impact of lifetime violence and abuse on pregnancy, postpartum and breastfeeding. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 8(3), 34–353.
Mary Kay Inc. (2009). Press release: “Mary Kay’s truth about abuse” survey links economic downturn to national increase in domestic violence. May 12, 2009. Retrieved March 21, 2010, from http://www.pcadv.org/Resources/MaryKay_Beauty_That_Counts_Release.pdf.
McFarlane JM, Campbell JC, Wilt S, Sachs CJ, Ulrich Y, Xu X. (1999). Stalking and intimate partner femicide. Homicide Studies, 3(4), 300–316.
Miller E, Decker MR, McCauley HL, Tancredi DJ, Levenson RR, et al. (2010). Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy. Contraception, 81(4), 316–322. Epub2010 Jan.27.
National Center on Elder Abuse. (2006). Issue brief: Late life domestic violence: What the aging network needs to know. Retrieved March 20, 2010, from http://www.ncea.aoa.gov/ncearoot/main_site/pdf/publication/nceaissuebrief.DVforagingnetwork.pdf.
National Center for Victims of Crime (NCVC). (2003). Cyberstalking. Retrieved January 24, 2007, from http://www.ncvc.org.
National Domestic Violence Hotline (NDVH). (2009). Increased financial stress affects domestic violence victims. Posted January 30, 2009. Retrieved March 10, 2010, from http://www.ndvh.org/2009/01/increased-financial-stress-affects-domestic-violence-victims.
National Scientific Council on the Developing Child. (2005). Excessive stress disrupts the architecture of the developing brain. Working Paper No. 3. Available from http://www.developingchild.net/pubs/sp/Stress_Disrupts_Architecture_Developing_Brain.pdf.
Nosek MA, Foley CC, Hughes RB, et al. (2001). Vulnerabilities for abuse among women with disabilities. Sexuality and Disability, 19, 177–90.
Office on Violence Against Women. (2010). About domestic violence. U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved March 19, 2010, from http://www.ovw.usdoj.gov/domviolence.htm.
Plichta SB. (2004). Intimate partner violence and physical health consequences: Policy and practice implications. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1293–1296.
Rinker AG Jr. (2009). Recognition and perception of elder abuse by prehospital and hospital-based care providers. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 48(1), 110–115.
Saltzman LE, Fanslow JL, McMahon PM, et al. (2002). Intimate partner violence surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended data elements. Atlanta: CDC, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Retrieved December 20, 2005, from http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/factsheets/ipvoverview.htm.
Silverman JG, Decker MR, Reed E, Raj A. (2006). Intimate partner violence victimization prior to and during pregnancy among women residing in 26 U.S. states: Associations with maternal and neonatal health. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 195(1), 140–148.
Smith DL & Strauser DR. (2008). Examining the impact of physical and sexual abuse on the employment of women with disabilities in the United States: An exploratory analysis. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30(14), 1039–1046.
Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC). (2005). Women’s health information: Intimate partner violence. Retrieved December 31, 2005, from http://www.sogc.org/health/health-ipv_e.asp.
Somanti M & Shibusawa T. (2008). Intimate partner violence among midlife and older women: A descriptive analysis of women seeking medical services. Health and Social Work, 33(1), 33–41.
Swahn MH, Simon TR, Arias I, Bossarte RM. (2008). Measuring sex differences in violence victimization and perpetration within date and same-sex peer relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(8), 1120–1138.
Tjaden P & Thoennes N. (2000). Extent, nature and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the national violence against women survey. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved December 27, 2005, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/pubs-sum/181867.htm.
Tower LE. (2006). Barriers in screening women for domestic violence: A survey of social workers, family practitioners, and obstetrician-gynecologists. Journal of Family Violence, 21, 245–257.
University of Maine, Center on Aging. (2007). Elder abuse screening user manual version 5/2/2007. Retrieved from http://www.umaine.edu/mainecenteronaging/pubandrep.htm.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2010). About domestic violence. Office on Violence against Women. Retrieved March 19, 2010, from http://www.ovs.usdoj.gov/domviolence.htm.
Wagenaar DB, Rosenbaum R, Page C, Herman S. (2009). Elder abuse education in residency programs: How well are we doing? Academic Medicine, 84(5), 611–618.
Walker L. (1984). The battered woman syndrome. New York: Springer.
Whitfield CL, Anda RF, Dube SR, Felitti VJ. (2003). Violent childhood experiences and the risk of intimate partner violence in adults: Assessment in a large health maintenance organization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(2), 166–185.
Wilke D & Vinton L. (2005). The nature and impact of domestic violence across age cohorts. Affilia Journal of Women and Social Work, 20(3), 316–328.
Women’s Rural Advocacy Programs (WRAP). (n.d.). Why women stay: The barriers to leaving. Retrieved April 2, 2010, from http://www.letswrap.com/dvinfo/whystay.htm.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2005). Multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women. Retrieved December 21, 2005, from http://www.who.int/en.
Zink T, Fisher BS, Regan S. (2005). The prevalence and incidence of intimate partner violence in older women in primary care practices. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20, 884–888.
Providing accredited healthcare continuing education since 1998